What is The Gambler’s Fallacy, and Should You Believe It?

(1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)

Loading ...

Jeffrey | Poker Strategy

The hot-hand fallacy arises when gamblers believe that a winning streak will continue. This assumption is predicated on the idea that had previously won several bets increases the likelihood that they will win the following bet or number of bets. Luck will continue to favor
them, and the same result of winning bets becomes more likely the more times it occurs. The gambler’s fallacy has the opposite effect. This is the belief that a gambler’s luck will change around, and they will begin winning after a losing run. Getting the same result over and over reduces the likelihood of it happening again in the future.

Before you choose your betting app after reading Mystake reviews online 2022, here are some things you need to know about the so-called Gambler’s Fallacy. Read on to learn more.

What exactly is the Gambler’s Fallacy?
In plain words, it is when a person anticipates a change in fortune following a lengthy run of one outcome. This implies that following a string of victories, they start to expect a defeat (or vice versa). A coin toss is the most obvious example of the gambler’s fallacy. If you flip a coin three times and each time it comes up heads, the gambler’s fallacy is expecting the fourth flip to come up tails. This way of thinking is wrong and demonstrates cognitive bias.

The gambler’s fallacy usually happens when individuals assume an occurrence is random, such as whether a roulette ball falls on the back or red. It does, however, have applicability in our sports betting. The gambler’s fallacy became well-known in psychology during the 1970s as part of a large body of work on cognitive biases by Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman.

Tversky and Kahneman, both psychologists and behavioral economists pioneered a new branch of research into what drives individuals to make illogical judgments.

Why is the Gambler’s Fallacy untrustworthy?
Many individuals believe that the gambler’s fallacy isn’t a fallacy at first glance. After all, the likelihood of landing a red on the roulette wheel five times in a row is negligible, right? Wrong! A statistical study has decisively demonstrated that this argument should not be followed.

Flipping a coin over a long period – and we’re talking billions of times – will create something very near to an equitable distribution of heads and tails. The more times a coin is flipped, the closer it gets to a 50/50 mix of heads and tails. This is referred to as the Law of Large Numbers.

The Law of Small Numbers applies when dealing with 10, 20, or even 50 coin flips, stating that a succession of seemingly low-probability coin flips isn’t nearly as impossible as we may assume.

The odds of landing six heads in succession are 1 in 64 (1/2 to the power of 6). These are by no means fantastic odds. 1/64 is a 1.6% probability of flipping heads six times in a row. Someone suffering from the gambler’s fallacy would undoubtedly look at these terrible odds after the fifth flip and think that the sixth flip will end in tails 98.4% of the time. In summary, they anticipate a reversal of events. This is completely incorrect. The likelihood of this sequence of events occurring is 100% if the first five flips are heads. It occurred right now! The sixth flip has nothing to do with the prior one, and the likelihood of it being heads is still 50%.

Conclusion
Fortunately, there are several methods for overcoming the gambler’s fallacy. It’s one of the simplest cognitive biases to overcome when placing sports bets. We become less susceptible to the gambler’s fallacy as we age. It’s at least one advantage of becoming older.

Special promotions

Poker Pro Bankroll Series

Latest Poker Strategy Articles

Contact PokerBankrollBlog

Questions? Concerns? Comments? Contact us! We'll return your email within 12 hours.