<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Short Stack Strategy &#8211; Ed Miller</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pokerbankrollblog.com/short_stack_strategy.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pokerbankrollblog.com/short_stack_strategy.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 03:19:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward S.</title>
		<link>http://pokerbankrollblog.com/short_stack_strategy.htm/comment-page-1#comment-7084</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 11:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerbankrollblog.com/?p=59#comment-7084</guid>
		<description>I kinda agree with what Lee has to say - I definitely feel that although some strategies can be described as &quot;shrewd&quot; - or even &quot;cunn(t)ing&quot; - it depends on the individual. Everyone has their own game plan and in the end what matters is who&#039;s winning!

Just my 2 cents!

Edward
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kinda agree with what Lee has to say &#8211; I definitely feel that although some strategies can be described as &#8220;shrewd&#8221; &#8211; or even &#8220;cunn(t)ing&#8221; &#8211; it depends on the individual. Everyone has their own game plan and in the end what matters is who&#8217;s winning!</p>
<p>Just my 2 cents!</p>
<p>Edward</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://pokerbankrollblog.com/short_stack_strategy.htm/comment-page-1#comment-6290</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerbankrollblog.com/?p=59#comment-6290</guid>
		<description>‎8-10x raises preflop is only polarising hands 3xBB gets same reaction as well as followup cbet of 4x bb will get same reaction AQ wants to be in the equation ep too  all in on flop is just pure donk when a standard 2/3rd pot will get same reaction thus bet saving

not enough steal range hands on cutoff or button or no real resteal options from blinds mail me i can show u mine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>‎8-10x raises preflop is only polarising hands 3xBB gets same reaction as well as followup cbet of 4x bb will get same reaction AQ wants to be in the equation ep too  all in on flop is just pure donk when a standard 2/3rd pot will get same reaction thus bet saving</p>
<p>not enough steal range hands on cutoff or button or no real resteal options from blinds mail me i can show u mine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://pokerbankrollblog.com/short_stack_strategy.htm/comment-page-1#comment-6289</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerbankrollblog.com/?p=59#comment-6289</guid>
		<description>@Andy: What&#039;s flawed about it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andy: What&#8217;s flawed about it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://pokerbankrollblog.com/short_stack_strategy.htm/comment-page-1#comment-6288</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerbankrollblog.com/?p=59#comment-6288</guid>
		<description>Hi Lee

Thanks for your sharing your views on this strategy. I&#039;m pretty sure many full stack players will call with their middle pairs most of the times when an Ace doesn&#039;t hit on the flop. In this situation you might be getting good enough pot odds for hitting your high card that an all in on a low card flop isn&#039;t that bad a move. 
Having said that, I agree with you that moving around and selecting good tables is key to any winning poker strategy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lee</p>
<p>Thanks for your sharing your views on this strategy. I&#8217;m pretty sure many full stack players will call with their middle pairs most of the times when an Ace doesn&#8217;t hit on the flop. In this situation you might be getting good enough pot odds for hitting your high card that an all in on a low card flop isn&#8217;t that bad a move.<br />
Having said that, I agree with you that moving around and selecting good tables is key to any winning poker strategy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://pokerbankrollblog.com/short_stack_strategy.htm/comment-page-1#comment-6287</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 19:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerbankrollblog.com/?p=59#comment-6287</guid>
		<description>flawed flawed flawed take it from someone who has been shortstacking for 2 years i have many aliases on i poker but try looking at SHORTSTACKING   on pokertableratings send message if you  want to chat about it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>flawed flawed flawed take it from someone who has been shortstacking for 2 years i have many aliases on i poker but try looking at SHORTSTACKING   on pokertableratings send message if you  want to chat about it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://pokerbankrollblog.com/short_stack_strategy.htm/comment-page-1#comment-6286</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerbankrollblog.com/?p=59#comment-6286</guid>
		<description>The one thing i would suggest is moving tables alot, to keep your oponents thinking.. as its quite a simple strategy i&#039;d think your A high all ins post flop will start to get called after force folding narrow middle or bottom pairs, also avoiding any prolonged periods spend with &quot;chip happy&quot; individuals would help too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one thing i would suggest is moving tables alot, to keep your oponents thinking.. as its quite a simple strategy i&#8217;d think your A high all ins post flop will start to get called after force folding narrow middle or bottom pairs, also avoiding any prolonged periods spend with &#8220;chip happy&#8221; individuals would help too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://pokerbankrollblog.com/short_stack_strategy.htm/comment-page-1#comment-6285</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerbankrollblog.com/?p=59#comment-6285</guid>
		<description>Well said Lee!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Lee!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://pokerbankrollblog.com/short_stack_strategy.htm/comment-page-1#comment-6284</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerbankrollblog.com/?p=59#comment-6284</guid>
		<description>i think Paul and Steve are a prime example of this so called &quot;cuntism&quot; its a poker world out there, unlimited amounts of strategies! if u don&#039;t like this particular one then don&#039;t use it! and if you don&#039;t like playing against this type of player then its proven theres some good use of it! a big side of poker is taking people out of there  comfort zones, (which generally makes us prone to mistakes) and if this is what does it to you then he&#039;s done a damn good job! which also brings me to Donkey, a bluff is flawed mathematically too but poker centres itself around this play. i havent yet used this guide yet but it has flair, scare and aggression which usually ties in quite well in poker. Thanks Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think Paul and Steve are a prime example of this so called &#8220;cuntism&#8221; its a poker world out there, unlimited amounts of strategies! if u don&#8217;t like this particular one then don&#8217;t use it! and if you don&#8217;t like playing against this type of player then its proven theres some good use of it! a big side of poker is taking people out of there  comfort zones, (which generally makes us prone to mistakes) and if this is what does it to you then he&#8217;s done a damn good job! which also brings me to Donkey, a bluff is flawed mathematically too but poker centres itself around this play. i havent yet used this guide yet but it has flair, scare and aggression which usually ties in quite well in poker. Thanks Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://pokerbankrollblog.com/short_stack_strategy.htm/comment-page-1#comment-6249</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 08:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerbankrollblog.com/?p=59#comment-6249</guid>
		<description>Lol that&#039;s a bit harsh isn&#039;t it? IMO poker is about maximizing your winnings through finding your edge against other players. If you edge happens to be a short stack strategy, then what&#039;s the problem?I&#039;m sure there are plenty of strategies out there to fight short stack players.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol that&#8217;s a bit harsh isn&#8217;t it? IMO poker is about maximizing your winnings through finding your edge against other players. If you edge happens to be a short stack strategy, then what&#8217;s the problem?I&#8217;m sure there are plenty of strategies out there to fight short stack players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bakari</title>
		<link>http://pokerbankrollblog.com/short_stack_strategy.htm/comment-page-1#comment-6246</link>
		<dc:creator>Bakari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 18:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerbankrollblog.com/?p=59#comment-6246</guid>
		<description>People like you who use this &quot;strategy&quot; are single-handedly ruining online poker. If it were up to me, I&#039;d have you and everyone who uses it permanently banned from every poker service.

You should be ashamed to call yourself a poker player.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People like you who use this &#8220;strategy&#8221; are single-handedly ruining online poker. If it were up to me, I&#8217;d have you and everyone who uses it permanently banned from every poker service.</p>
<p>You should be ashamed to call yourself a poker player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

